SAM

← All answers

When a New Testament writer quotes a non-biblical source (Paul quoting pagan poets in Acts 17:28, 1 Corinthians 15:33 and Titus 1:12, or Jude quoting Enoch), does that make the source scripture?

Inferred

No single verse settles it; the conclusion is assembled across texts and leans one way.

No, quoting a source does not make it scripture. The text defines scripture by divine origin (God-breathed), not by apostolic quotation, and no NT author calls the pagan poets or 1 Enoch "graphē" (holy Writ). The inference that quotation equals canonization requires an unstated step the text never takes.

The NT's own definition of scripture (2 Timothy 3:16, "every graphē is theopneustos") rests on divine origin, not on being quoted. No text states that quoting a source makes it scripture; reaching that conclusion requires an unstated assumption the text does not supply.

Key texts:
Acts 17:28Tier 4 · Apostle
“‘For in him we live, move, and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also his offspring.’”
Acts 17:22-23Tier 4 · Apostle
“Paul stood in the middle of the Areopagus and said, “You men of Athens, I perceive that you are very religious in all things. For as I passed along and observed the objects of your worship, I also fou…”
1 Corinthians 15:33Tier 4 · Apostle
“Don’t be deceived! “Evil companionships corrupt good morals.””

…and 9 more verses weighed in the full analysis.

This is a summary.

See SAM's complete analysis, every verse it weighs, ranked by who is speaking (God, Jesus, the apostles), with the full step-by-step reasoning and word-for-word verified citations. New accounts get two free questions.

See the full analysis in SAM →

SAM answers from primary-source texts only, weighing each verse by its authority tier. Every quotation is verified word-for-word. How the method works →

← Browse all answers